PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RELVX vs. RALVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RELVX vs. RALVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RELVX achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than RALVX's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, RELVX has outperformed RALVX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while RALVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.


RELVX

1D
-0.74%
1M
2.72%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.57%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
9.22%

RALVX

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.46%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.51%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RELVX vs. RALVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RELVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund
10.01%18.70%12.82%18.70%-17.25%20.58%4.04%18.42%-9.80%15.56%
RALVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund
8.98%17.44%11.36%17.18%-16.76%17.82%6.13%15.33%-7.92%13.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RELVX and RALVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.99

The correlation between RELVX and RALVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RELVX vs. RALVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RELVX
RELVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RELVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RELVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RELVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RELVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RELVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

RALVX
RALVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RELVX vs. RALVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RELVXRALVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.74

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

12.23

+0.22

RELVX vs. RALVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RELVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the RALVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RELVX and RALVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RELVXRALVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.28

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.59

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.61

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.25

-0.04

Drawdowns

RELVX vs. RALVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RELVX drawdown since its inception was -66.26%, which is greater than RALVX's maximum drawdown of -59.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RELVX and RALVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RELVXRALVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.26%

-59.59%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-8.16%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-13.71%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.53%

-24.35%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-30.08%

-4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.63%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-13.26%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.83%

+0.14%

Volatility

RELVX vs. RALVX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) at 2.96%. This indicates that RELVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RALVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RELVXRALVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

2.96%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

7.79%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

9.83%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

13.19%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

13.68%

+1.50%

RELVX vs. RALVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RELVX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than RALVX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RELVX vs. RALVX - Dividend Comparison

RELVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.75%, less than RALVX's 10.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RALVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund
10.70%11.68%2.31%1.21%4.20%17.98%0.54%6.24%7.01%5.99%4.79%1.23%
RELVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund
9.75%10.67%0.80%1.15%5.74%8.12%1.67%3.09%5.24%2.47%1.82%1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RELVX and RALVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RELVX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to RALVX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RELVX dropped -66.26% vs RALVX's -59.59%.

RELVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RELVX and RALVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer