PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REK vs. URE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REK vs. URE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REK achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 13.97% return. Over the past 10 years, REK has underperformed URE with an annualized return of -6.20%, while URE has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.


REK

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-5.51%
1Y
-2.96%
3Y*
-3.69%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
-6.20%

URE

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
13.97%
6M
11.99%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
-4.07%
10Y*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REK vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
-6.58%2.35%1.42%-6.61%29.17%-30.58%-11.33%-20.96%4.61%-9.34%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
13.97%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-13.80%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between REK and URE is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2010

-0.96

The correlation between REK and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

REK vs. URE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REK
URE

Financial Services

46.7%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

67.2%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

REK
46.7%
URE
8.6%

Basic Materials

REK

-

URE
1.2%

Communication Services

REK

-

URE

-

Consumer Cyclical

REK

-

URE

-

Consumer Defensive

REK

-

URE

-

Energy

REK

-

URE

-

Healthcare

REK

-

URE

-

Industrials

REK

-

URE

-

Real Estate

REK

-

URE
67.2%

Technology

REK

-

URE

-

Utilities

REK

-

URE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REK vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REK
REK Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
REK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
REK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
REK Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
REK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REK vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REKUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.07

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

0.50

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

1.20

-1.87

REK vs. URE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REK Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the URE Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REK and URE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REKUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

0.31

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.11

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.31

0.07

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.06

-0.43

Drawdowns

REK vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REK drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REK and URE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REKUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.57%

-97.16%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-16.50%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-33.77%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.93%

-63.66%

+36.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.67%

-70.49%

+11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.95%

-52.68%

-29.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.08%

-64.52%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

6.83%

-2.41%

Volatility

REK vs. URE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) is 3.91%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that REK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REKUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

7.56%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

19.29%

-9.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

26.73%

-13.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

37.28%

-18.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

40.53%

-20.23%

REK vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both REK and URE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

REK vs. URE - Dividend Comparison

REK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than URE's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
3.27%3.43%6.22%4.50%0.48%0.00%0.07%1.28%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
2.05%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


REK and URE have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URE has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to REK (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REK dropped -84.57% vs URE's -97.16%.

On 10-year performance, URE leads with 2.80% vs -6.20% for REK. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, REK has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URE has performed better with a 2.80% return vs -6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REK and URE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

REK has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.05% for URE.

REK tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%), while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%).

URE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REK and URE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer