PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REK vs. GQRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REK vs. GQRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REK achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than GQRE's 7.34% return. Over the past 10 years, REK has underperformed GQRE with an annualized return of -6.20%, while GQRE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.78% annualized return.


REK

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-5.51%
1Y
-2.96%
3Y*
-3.69%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
-6.20%

GQRE

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
7.34%
6M
7.63%
1Y
11.71%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
3.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REK vs. GQRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
-6.58%2.35%1.42%-6.61%29.17%-30.58%-11.33%-20.96%4.61%-9.34%
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
7.34%8.27%6.09%9.21%-27.22%32.01%-9.17%21.84%-8.88%13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between REK and GQRE is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

-0.87

The correlation between REK and GQRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

REK vs. GQRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REK
GQRE

Financial Services

46.7%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.6%

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

87.9%

Technology

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Financial Services

REK
46.7%
GQRE
2.0%

Basic Materials

REK

-

GQRE
0.0%

Communication Services

REK

-

GQRE
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

REK

-

GQRE
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

REK

-

GQRE
0.5%

Energy

REK

-

GQRE

-

Healthcare

REK

-

GQRE
0.6%

Industrials

REK

-

GQRE
0.2%

Real Estate

REK

-

GQRE
87.9%

Technology

REK

-

GQRE
0.8%

Utilities

REK

-

GQRE
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REK vs. GQRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REK
REK Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
REK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
REK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
REK Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
REK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRE
GQRE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GQRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REK vs. GQRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REKGQREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.18

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

1.16

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

4.42

-5.09

REK vs. GQRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REK Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the GQRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REK and GQRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REKGQREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

1.01

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.12

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.31

0.21

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.30

-0.78

Drawdowns

REK vs. GQRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REK drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, which is greater than GQRE's maximum drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REK and GQRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REKGQREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.57%

-41.87%

-42.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-10.15%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-16.17%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.93%

-35.08%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.67%

-41.87%

-16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.95%

-3.43%

-78.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.08%

-9.24%

-54.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

2.66%

+1.76%

Volatility

REK vs. GQRE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) at 3.53%. This indicates that REK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REKGQREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.53%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

8.77%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

11.64%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

16.45%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

17.66%

+2.64%

REK vs. GQRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

REK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

REK vs. GQRE - Dividend Comparison

REK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than GQRE's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQRE
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund
4.36%4.75%3.77%2.91%2.56%2.36%2.05%4.29%3.22%1.97%4.16%2.32%
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
3.27%3.43%6.22%4.50%0.48%0.00%0.07%1.28%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REK and GQRE have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REK has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to GQRE (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REK dropped -84.57% vs GQRE's -41.87%.

On 10-year performance, GQRE leads with 3.78% vs -6.20% for REK. On fees, GQRE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GQRE has performed better with a 3.78% return vs -6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GQRE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REK.

GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 3.27% for REK.

REK tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%), while GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REK and 0.45% for GQRE.

GQRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REK and GQRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer