PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGN vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REGN vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGN achieves a -20.48% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, REGN has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 5.35%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 43.12% annualized return.


REGN

1D
0.11%
1M
-14.00%
YTD
-20.48%
6M
-17.20%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
-7.00%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
5.35%

ANET

1D
4.37%
1M
10.44%
YTD
24.58%
6M
30.84%
1Y
76.76%
3Y*
57.04%
5Y*
48.31%
10Y*
43.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGN vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-20.48%8.96%-18.90%21.73%14.25%30.72%28.66%0.53%-0.65%2.42%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
24.58%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%

Correlation

The correlation between REGN and ANET is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between REGN and ANET has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

REGN:

$65.93B

ANET:

$207.94B

EPS

REGN:

$41.05

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

REGN:

14.91

ANET:

55.91

PS Ratio

REGN:

4.42

ANET:

21.42

PB Ratio

REGN:

2.10

ANET:

15.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

REGN:

$14.92B

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

REGN:

$12.61B

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

REGN:

$5.74B

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGN vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGN
REGN Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
REGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
REGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGN Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGN vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGNANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

2.50

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

5.20

-3.04

REGN vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGN Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGN and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGN vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGN drawdown since its inception was -91.81%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGN and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGNANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.81%

-52.20%

-39.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-28.33%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.69%

-50.42%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.69%

-50.42%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.69%

-52.20%

-7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.64%

-8.15%

-40.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-15.39%

-27.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.33%

13.60%

-5.27%

Volatility

REGN vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is 12.77%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that REGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGNANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.77%

16.62%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.14%

40.79%

-18.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.77%

53.57%

-20.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.79%

47.23%

-16.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.17%

45.00%

-12.83%

Dividends

REGN vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

REGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.59%0.46%

Financials

REGN vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
3.61B
2.71B
(REGN) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

REGN vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
81.4%
61.9%
Portfolio components
REGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.94B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

REGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 642.90M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

REGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 727.20M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


REGN and ANET have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to REGN (12.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGN dropped -91.81% vs ANET's -52.20%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGN and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer