PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGB.L vs. WSTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

REGB.L is traded in GBP, while WSTCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WSTCX values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than WSTCX's 30.61% return.


REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-25.94%
6M
-19.80%
YTD
-2.72%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
-5.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-12.32%

WSTCX

1D
-1.37%
1M
-11.91%
6M
24.70%
YTD
30.61%
1Y
46.44%
3Y*
57.36%
5Y*
29.81%
10Y*
26.34%
ALL TIME*
20.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
-2.72%75.67%-34.55%-22.78%-22.89%-20.32%
WSTCX
Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund
30.61%23.39%121.62%32.22%-25.28%-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between REGB.L and WSTCX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.26

The correlation between REGB.L and WSTCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGB.L vs. WSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

WSTCX
WSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGB.LWSTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.30

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.57

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

10.28

-6.10

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the WSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGB.L and WSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, which is greater than WSTCX's maximum drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and WSTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGB.LWSTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.24%

-56.20%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.96%

-12.91%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.87%

-45.42%

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.93%

-11.91%

-35.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.80%

-11.95%

-32.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

4.47%

+6.34%

Volatility

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund (WSTCX) at 10.10%. This indicates that REGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGB.LWSTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.20%

10.10%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.15%

21.57%

+11.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.18%

26.56%

+19.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.33%

73.97%

-27.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.33%

54.78%

-8.45%

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WSTCX's 2.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGB.L vs. WSTCX - Dividend Comparison

REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WSTCX
Delaware Ivy Science and Technology Fund
10.24%13.35%81.76%21.98%57.60%61.50%11.27%13.85%16.72%7.61%0.00%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGB.L and WSTCX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGB.L and WSTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer