PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGB.L vs. LBS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

REGB.L is traded in GBP, while LBS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LBS.TO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly lower than LBS.TO's 88.98% return.


REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.49%
YTD
18.88%
6M
17.85%
1Y
119.58%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
10Y*

LBS.TO

1D
-0.69%
1M
30.47%
YTD
88.98%
6M
87.16%
1Y
161.38%
3Y*
55.07%
5Y*
36.77%
10Y*
29.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
18.88%75.67%-34.55%-22.78%-22.89%-20.32%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
88.98%51.24%29.98%7.45%6.24%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between REGB.L and LBS.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGB.LLBS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.86

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.75

6.50

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.85

28.39

-14.54

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGB.L and LBS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, smaller than the maximum LBS.TO drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and LBS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGB.LLBS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.24%

-81.66%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-24.97%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.57%

-33.27%

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.15%

-1.35%

-33.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.85%

-12.70%

-32.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.67%

5.71%

+2.96%

Volatility

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) have volatilities of 13.31% and 12.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGB.LLBS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.31%

12.69%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.06%

42.68%

-9.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.40%

45.70%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.35%

31.02%

+15.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.35%

39.84%

+6.51%

Dividends

REGB.L vs. LBS.TO - Dividend Comparison

REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.
7.21%12.92%17.12%19.61%17.88%15.33%7.16%19.39%23.12%15.52%15.92%19.20%
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGB.L and LBS.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGB.L and LBS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer