REET vs. TRET.AS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS).

REET and TRET.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014. TRET.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on Apr 14, 2011. Both REET and TRET.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

REET vs. TRET.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

REET vs. TRET.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	1.30%	7.97%	2.65%	10.28%	-24.10%	32.43%	-10.48%	24.42%	-5.27%	7.48%
TRET.AS VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	1.00%	14.63%	1.52%	12.54%	-25.92%	30.92%	-6.99%	19.24%	-4.51%	9.93%

Different Trading Currencies

REET is traded in USD, while TRET.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the TRET.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than TRET.AS's 1.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with REET having a 3.46% annualized return and TRET.AS not far ahead at 3.61%.

REET

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -7.25%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 7.51%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 2.64%
• 10Y*: 3.46%

TRET.AS

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -8.76%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 9.69%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: 3.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. TRET.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than TRET.AS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

TRET.AS

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

REET

iShares Global REIT ETF

Return for Risk

REET vs. TRET.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET

REET Risk / Return Rank: 30
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 28
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 35

TRET.AS

TRET.AS Risk / Return Rank: 20
TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TRET.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TRET.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TRET.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
TRET.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. TRET.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REET	TRET.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	0.65	-0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	0.96	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.13	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	0.93	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	3.91	-1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REET vs. TRET.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and TRET.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REET	TRET.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	0.65	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.22	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.21	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.00	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between REET and TRET.AS is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

REET vs. TRET.AS - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than TRET.AS's 3.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	3.65%	3.67%	3.64%	3.27%	2.43%	3.18%	2.65%	5.25%	5.73%	3.84%	5.37%	3.56%
TRET.AS VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	3.49%	3.66%	3.41%	3.67%	4.68%	1.78%	4.43%	3.33%	4.31%	3.16%	3.13%	2.55%

Drawdowns

REET vs. TRET.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum TRET.AS drawdown of -99.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and TRET.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	REET	TRET.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-99.19%	+54.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.70%	-12.40%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.11%	-30.50%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.59%	-41.80%	-2.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.39%	-97.93%	+90.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-96.56%	+86.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.57%	+0.22%

Volatility

REET vs. TRET.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 4.66%, while VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRET.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REET	TRET.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	5.00%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	8.89%	-0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	14.66%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	16.40%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	17.30%	+1.53%