PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REET vs. DRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REET vs. DRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than DRN's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has outperformed DRN with an annualized return of 3.99%, while DRN has yielded a comparatively lower -5.09% annualized return.


REET

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
8.07%
6M
7.69%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
3.99%

DRN

1D
0.10%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
19.48%
6M
15.83%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
-11.56%
10Y*
-5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. DRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
8.07%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-5.27%7.48%
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
19.48%-11.24%-5.29%12.03%-67.26%152.94%-55.37%81.86%-25.11%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and DRN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014

0.93

The correlation between REET and DRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

REET vs. DRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REET
DRN

Real Estate

99.8%
19.6%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

REET
99.8%
DRN
19.6%

Financial Services

REET
0.2%
DRN

-

Basic Materials

REET

-

DRN
0.4%

Communication Services

REET

-

DRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

REET

-

DRN

-

Consumer Defensive

REET

-

DRN

-

Energy

REET

-

DRN

-

Healthcare

REET

-

DRN

-

Industrials

REET

-

DRN

-

Technology

REET

-

DRN

-

Utilities

REET

-

DRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REET vs. DRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DRN
DRN Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. DRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REETDRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.32

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

0.72

+4.17

REET vs. DRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the DRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and DRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REETDRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.20

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

-0.20

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

-0.08

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.21

+0.04

Drawdowns

REET vs. DRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum DRN drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and DRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REETDRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-86.32%

+41.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-24.28%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-48.26%

+30.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-80.58%

+48.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

-86.32%

+41.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.83%

-65.93%

+63.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-35.07%

+25.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

10.91%

-8.40%

Volatility

REET vs. DRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 3.79%, while Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REETDRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

11.13%

-7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

28.89%

-20.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

40.04%

-27.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

56.65%

-39.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

60.61%

-41.77%

REET vs. DRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DRN's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

REET vs. DRN - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than DRN's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares
2.23%2.81%2.24%2.84%2.70%4.21%1.90%2.59%3.11%0.91%0.00%0.00%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.42%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, REET and DRN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRN has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to REET (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs DRN's -86.32%.

On 10-year performance, REET leads with 3.99% vs -5.09% for DRN. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 3.99% return vs -5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRN.

REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.23% for DRN.

REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.99% for DRN.

REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REET and DRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer