PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REET vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REET vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.


REET

1D
0.76%
1M
2.38%
YTD
12.42%
6M
13.41%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
4.50%

AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
5.11%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
42.12%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
12.42%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%1.60%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and AVUV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.64

The correlation between REET and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REET vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REETAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

5.06

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

15.09

-9.09

REET vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REET vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REETAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-49.42%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-7.95%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-28.79%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-28.79%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-7.91%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.67%

-0.15%

Volatility

REET vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 4.16%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REETAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

4.53%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

11.34%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

17.63%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

22.75%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

28.26%

-9.41%

REET vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

REET vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.29%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


REET and AVUV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to REET (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs 2.51% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.61% for AVUV.

REET is categorized as REIT, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REET and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer