PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REBYX vs. RTHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REBYX achieves a 17.23% return, which is significantly higher than RTHAX's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, REBYX has outperformed RTHAX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while RTHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.91% annualized return.


REBYX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.17%
YTD
17.23%
6M
16.82%
1Y
36.24%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.36%

RTHAX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.56%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
17.23%8.86%8.16%13.81%-16.14%26.28%13.04%23.74%-12.22%2.12%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
2.46%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between REBYX and RTHAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.07

The correlation between REBYX and RTHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REBYX vs. RTHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REBYX
REBYX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
REBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
REBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
REBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
REBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REBYXRTHAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.34

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.49

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.61

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

2.46

+1.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.63

8.09

+6.54

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REBYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the RTHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REBYX and RTHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REBYXRTHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.34

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.12

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.59

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.67

-0.33

Drawdowns

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REBYX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than RTHAX's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REBYX and RTHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REBYXRTHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-18.89%

-43.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-2.74%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.68%

-7.56%

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-18.89%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.79%

-18.89%

-25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-3.73%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

0.83%

+1.82%

Volatility

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) at 1.10%. This indicates that REBYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REBYXRTHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

1.10%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

2.06%

+10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.84%

2.89%

+14.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.76%

5.12%

+17.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.53%

4.98%

+18.55%

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REBYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RTHAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

REBYX vs. RTHAX - Dividend Comparison

REBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than RTHAX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
7.06%8.28%13.03%2.64%5.30%31.12%0.64%4.46%18.61%0.33%0.88%8.23%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.22%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REBYX and RTHAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REBYX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to RTHAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REBYX dropped -62.03% vs RTHAX's -18.89%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REBYX and RTHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer