PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REBYX vs. REMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REBYX vs. REMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) and Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REBYX achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly lower than REMSX's 29.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with REBYX having a 9.26% annualized return and REMSX not far ahead at 9.68%.


REBYX

1D
-0.93%
1M
0.99%
YTD
16.13%
6M
15.52%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
9.26%

REMSX

1D
-0.99%
1M
7.90%
YTD
29.25%
6M
31.12%
1Y
55.68%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REBYX vs. REMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
16.13%8.86%8.16%13.81%-16.14%26.28%13.04%23.74%-12.22%2.12%
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
29.25%33.98%8.16%8.37%-22.59%0.75%9.85%19.11%-16.74%35.45%

Correlation

The correlation between REBYX and REMSX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.61

The correlation between REBYX and REMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REBYX vs. REMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REBYX
REBYX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
REBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
REBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
REBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
REBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

REMSX
REMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
REMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
REMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REBYX vs. REMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) and Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REBYXREMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.61

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

4.15

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.24

16.39

-3.15

REBYX vs. REMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the REMSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REBYX and REMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REBYXREMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

3.35

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.45

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.56

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.29

+0.05

Drawdowns

REBYX vs. REMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REBYX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, smaller than the maximum REMSX drawdown of -66.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REBYX and REMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REBYXREMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-66.80%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-13.87%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.68%

-16.56%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-37.33%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.79%

-41.09%

-3.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.99%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-19.34%

+8.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.51%

-0.86%

Volatility

REBYX vs. REMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (REBYX) is 5.04%, while Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that REBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REBYXREMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

7.39%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

14.70%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

17.19%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

16.52%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.52%

17.34%

+6.18%

REBYX vs. REMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REBYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than REMSX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

REBYX vs. REMSX - Dividend Comparison

REBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than REMSX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REBYX
Russell Investments U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund
7.13%8.28%13.03%2.64%5.30%31.12%0.64%4.46%18.61%0.33%0.88%8.23%
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
1.52%1.97%2.58%2.42%2.17%14.04%0.59%2.51%4.57%1.10%1.08%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


REBYX and REMSX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMSX has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to REBYX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REBYX dropped -62.03% vs REMSX's -66.80%.

REMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REBYX and REMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer