RDVY vs. HLI
RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while HLI (Houlihan Lokey, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RDVY returned 16.29%/yr vs 21.76%/yr for HLI. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RDVY vs. HLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly higher than HLI's -20.15% return. Over the past 10 years, RDVY has underperformed HLI with an annualized return of 16.29%, while HLI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.76% annualized return.
RDVY
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
HLI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -20.15%
- 6M
- -22.50%
- 1Y
- -18.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- 21.76%
RDVY vs. HLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 13.41% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | -20.15% | 1.64% | 47.04% | 40.67% | -13.88% | 57.04% | 40.61% | 36.33% | -17.20% | 49.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVY and HLI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between RDVY and HLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVY vs. HLI — Risk / Return Rank
RDVY
HLI
RDVY vs. HLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVY | HLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.88 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | -0.59 | +3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | -1.12 | +14.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVY vs. HLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than HLI's maximum drawdown of -36.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and HLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVY | HLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -36.57% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -34.38% | +25.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.11% | -34.38% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | -36.57% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -36.57% | -4.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -33.28% | +33.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -9.59% | +4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 18.07% | -15.92% |
Volatility
RDVY vs. HLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is 5.04%, while Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that RDVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVY | HLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 8.26% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 19.38% | -7.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 26.11% | -11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 27.97% | -8.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 26.89% | -5.76% |
Dividends
RDVY vs. HLI - Dividend Comparison
RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than HLI's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | 1.81% | 1.36% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 1.56% | 1.90% | 2.46% | 2.74% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 0.57% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.89% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVY and HLI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLI has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to RDVY (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs HLI's -36.57%.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVY and HLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer