RDVI vs. YCS
RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - RDVI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RDVI returned 20.36%/yr vs 18.53%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. RDVI charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
RDVI vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 13.85% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 10.06% return.
RDVI
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 13.85%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 27.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 34.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
RDVI vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 13.85% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 8.29% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 10.06% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | -23.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVI and YCS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | -0.03 |
The correlation between RDVI and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVI vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
RDVI
YCS
RDVI vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.14 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 13.04 | +0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVI vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -49.56% | +31.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -8.30% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -23.05% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | 0.00% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -19.87% | +16.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.63% | -0.62% |
Volatility
RDVI vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that RDVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVI | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 2.25% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 11.91% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 16.93% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 21.10% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 18.82% | -1.87% |
RDVI vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDVI vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.63% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVI and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVI has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 20.36% vs 18.53% for YCS. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 20.36% return vs 18.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
RDVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVI and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer