RDTL vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RDTL (GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTL returned -15.91% vs 3622.12% for MULL. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.

Performance

RDTL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTL achieves a -61.77% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 780.13% return.

RDTL

• 1D: -6.16%
• 1M: 27.13%
• YTD: -61.77%
• 6M: -60.64%
• 1Y: -15.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: -26.45%
• 1M: 69.00%
• YTD: 780.13%
• 6M: 832.94%
• 1Y: 3,622.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF	-61.77%	104.22%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	780.13%	465.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTL and MULL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025	0.28

RDTL vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDTL	MULL
Communication Services	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RDTL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTL

RDTL Risk / Return Rank: 11
RDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
RDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 15
RDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTL	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	25.24	-25.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	5.61	-4.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.71	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	69.24	-69.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	221.31	-221.60

RDTL vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTL Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 25.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTL and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDTL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTL drawdown since its inception was -85.21%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTL and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTL	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.21%	-72.29%	-12.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.21%	-53.09%	-32.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.73%	-26.45%	-50.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.92%	-20.52%	-24.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.52%	16.58%	+38.94%

Volatility

RDTL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) is 49.06%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 74.91%. This indicates that RDTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTL	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	49.06%	74.91%	-25.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	95.69%	119.83%	-24.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	131.93%	145.72%	-13.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.06%	142.49%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.06%	142.49%	+0.57%

RDTL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDTL and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

Dividends

RDTL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

RDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTL and MULL in my portfolio?

RDTL and MULL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTL or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (74.91%) compared to RDTL (49.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTL dropped -85.21% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, RDTL or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 3622.12% vs -15.91% for RDTL. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, RDTL has been the lower-risk option at 49.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTL or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 3622.12% return vs -15.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTL or MULL?

RDTL and MULL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTL or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for RDTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (25.24 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.