RDTL vs. BMNG
RDTL (GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
RDTL vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDTL achieves a -56.09% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -80.92% return.
RDTL
- 1D
- -4.42%
- 1M
- 13.03%
- 6M
- -55.36%
- YTD
- -56.09%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- 6M
- -84.80%
- YTD
- -80.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTL vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF | -56.09% | 3.97% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -80.92% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDTL and BMNG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDTL vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank
RDTL
BMNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDTL vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDTL | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDTL vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDTL drawdown since its inception was -85.21%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTL and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDTL | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.21% | -97.32% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.28% | -96.45% | +23.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.25% | -83.42% | +37.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.34% | — | — |
Volatility
RDTL vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDTL | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 135.03% | 186.10% | -51.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.95% | 186.10% | -43.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.95% | 186.10% | -43.15% |
RDTL vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDTL vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither RDTL nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDTL and BMNG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDTL.
RDTL and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDTL and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for RDTL and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer