RDTL vs. AGZD
RDTL (GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. RDTL is actively managed, while AGZD is passively managed. Over the past year, RDTL returned -15.91% vs 5.52% for AGZD. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. RDTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
RDTL vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDTL achieves a -61.77% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 2.29% return.
RDTL
- 1D
- -6.16%
- 1M
- 27.13%
- YTD
- -61.77%
- 6M
- -60.64%
- 1Y
- -15.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
RDTL vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF | -61.77% | 104.22% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.29% | 3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDTL and AGZD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDTL vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
RDTL
AGZD
RDTL vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDTL | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 7.57 | -7.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 22.52 | -22.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDTL vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDTL drawdown since its inception was -85.21%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTL and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDTL | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.21% | -8.46% | -76.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.21% | -0.73% | -84.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.73% | -0.56% | -76.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.92% | -0.77% | -44.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.52% | 0.25% | +55.27% |
Volatility
RDTL vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) has a higher volatility of 49.06% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 1.15%. This indicates that RDTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDTL | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 49.06% | 1.15% | +47.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 95.69% | 2.08% | +93.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 131.93% | 2.84% | +129.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.06% | 3.60% | +139.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.06% | 3.72% | +139.34% |
RDTL vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDTL vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
RDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDTL and AGZD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDTL has higher volatility (49.06%) compared to AGZD (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTL dropped -85.21% vs AGZD's -8.46%.
On 1-year performance, AGZD leads with 5.52% vs -15.91% for RDTL. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 5.52% return vs -15.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDTL.
AGZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.00% for RDTL.
RDTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDTL and 0.23% for AGZD.
AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDTL and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer