RDFN vs. HIPO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RDFN (Redfin Corporation) and HIPO (Hippo Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. RDFN operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while HIPO operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services). At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RDFN vs. HIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIPO

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: -15.09%
• 6M: -17.80%
• 1Y: -13.60%
• 3Y*: 14.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDFN vs. HIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-34.12%
HIPO Hippo Holdings Inc.	-15.09%	12.36%	193.53%	-32.94%	-80.78%	-73.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RDFN and HIPO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2021	0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between RDFN and HIPO has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) RDFN : $1.04B HIPO : $479.80M
Gross Profit (TTM) RDFN : $364.02M HIPO : $194.20M
EBITDA (TTM) RDFN : -$129.82M HIPO : $116.10M

Return for Risk

RDFN vs. HIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDFN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HIPO

HIPO Risk / Return Rank: 28
HIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
HIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 27
HIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
HIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDFN vs. HIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redfin Corporation (RDFN) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDFN	HIPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.97	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.38	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.69	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RDFN	HIPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-97.41%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.35%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-90.41%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-88.29%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDFN	HIPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	41.39%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	72.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	72.00%	—

Dividends

RDFN vs. HIPO - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDFN nor HIPO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDFN and HIPO in my portfolio?

RDFN and HIPO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.