RCTRX vs. PADZX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RCTRX (Regan Total Return Income Fund) and PADZX (PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RCTRX returned 4.42%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for PADZX. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. RCTRX charges 1.54%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PADZX.

Performance

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regan Total Return Income Fund (RCTRX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTRX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than PADZX's 2.29% return.

RCTRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: 4.42%
• 10Y*: —

PADZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 5.92%
• 3Y*: 6.49%
• 5Y*: 3.95%
• 10Y*: 4.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RCTRX Regan Total Return Income Fund	0.98%	6.56%	6.81%	7.29%	-2.23%	6.89%	2.60%
PADZX PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund	2.29%	5.10%	7.48%	6.11%	-1.55%	1.87%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTRX and PADZX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020	-0.12

The correlation between RCTRX and PADZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (3 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RCTRX vs. PADZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCTRX

RCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 87
RCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
RCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

PADZX

PADZX Risk / Return Rank: 96
PADZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PADZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PADZX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PADZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PADZX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regan Total Return Income Fund (RCTRX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCTRX	PADZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.78	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.90	6.26	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	2.86	-1.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	7.71	-3.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	38.13	-23.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the PADZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCTRX and PADZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCTRX	PADZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.78	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.97	1.84	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.34	1.20	+1.14

Drawdowns

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTRX drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum PADZX drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTRX and PADZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTRX	PADZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-17.99%	+13.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.44%	-0.76%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.96%	-0.98%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.66%	-4.05%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.76%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.58%	-0.95%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.15%	+0.22%

Volatility

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regan Total Return Income Fund (RCTRX) is 0.73%, while PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that RCTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PADZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCTRX	PADZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	1.42%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.41%	1.77%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87%	2.10%	-0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.26%	2.16%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.21%	3.16%	-0.95%

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTRX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PADZX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTRX vs. PADZX - Dividend Comparison

RCTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than PADZX's 5.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PADZX PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund	5.08%	5.07%	5.18%	4.09%	2.89%	2.40%	3.41%	10.79%	5.02%	2.75%	2.36%	2.38%
RCTRX Regan Total Return Income Fund	5.81%	4.40%	5.79%	5.98%	5.28%	10.59%	4.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTRX and PADZX in my portfolio?

RCTRX and PADZX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCTRX or PADZX?

PADZX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to RCTRX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTRX dropped -4.66% vs PADZX's -17.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.