PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCRUY vs. ATLKY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR (RCRUY) and Atlas Copco AB (ATLKY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCRUY achieves a 35.02% return, which is significantly higher than ATLKY's 12.39% return.


RCRUY

1D
-1.81%
1M
11.69%
6M
25.33%
YTD
35.02%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
33.67%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*

ATLKY

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.15%
6M
3.44%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
14.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RCRUY
Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR
35.02%-19.34%67.52%34.89%-49.18%44.83%11.39%60.64%-12.96%
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
12.39%20.68%-10.78%48.16%-29.36%37.53%30.53%71.31%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RCRUY and ATLKY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2018

0.34

The correlation between RCRUY and ATLKY shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RCRUY:

$106.11B

ATLKY:

$96.74B

EPS

RCRUY:

¥70.90

ATLKY:

SEK 5.38

PE Ratio

RCRUY:

34.64

ATLKY:

35.55

PEG Ratio

RCRUY:

1.68

ATLKY:

3.68

PS Ratio

RCRUY:

4.65

ATLKY:

5.91

PB Ratio

RCRUY:

10.79

ATLKY:

7.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

RCRUY:

¥3.75T

ATLKY:

SEK 157.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RCRUY:

¥2.19T

ATLKY:

SEK 67.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

RCRUY:

¥769.64B

ATLKY:

SEK 41.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCRUY vs. ATLKY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCRUY
RCRUY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RCRUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCRUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCRUY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RCRUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCRUY Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ATLKY
ATLKY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ATLKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATLKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATLKY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ATLKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATLKY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR (RCRUY) and Atlas Copco AB (ATLKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RCRUYATLKYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

2.19

-0.46

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCRUY Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the ATLKY Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCRUY and ATLKY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCRUY drawdown since its inception was -65.71%, roughly equal to the maximum ATLKY drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCRUY and ATLKY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCRUYATLKYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.71%

-69.14%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.44%

-23.32%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.79%

-30.79%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.71%

-47.92%

-17.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-7.79%

+5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.95%

-16.71%

-9.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.08%

8.71%

+10.37%

Volatility

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR (RCRUY) is 9.94%, while Atlas Copco AB (ATLKY) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that RCRUY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATLKY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCRUYATLKYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

10.76%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.29%

26.77%

+9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.68%

33.53%

+13.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.96%

34.48%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.38%

33.70%

+5.68%

Dividends

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Dividend Comparison

RCRUY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATLKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
2.21%1.76%1.72%1.26%3.21%1.25%2.21%1.69%7.41%2.65%4.72%2.87%
RCRUY
Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR
0.00%0.15%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR and Atlas Copco AB. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
978.22B
42.02B
(RCRUY) Total Revenue
(ATLKY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RCRUY values in JPY, ATLKY values in SEK

RCRUY vs. ATLKY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR and Atlas Copco AB over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
60.1%
42.2%
Portfolio components
RCRUY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 587.67B and revenue of 978.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.1%.

ATLKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atlas Copco AB reported a gross profit of 17.74B and revenue of 42.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

RCRUY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 151.71B and revenue of 978.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

ATLKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atlas Copco AB reported an operating income of 8.33B and revenue of 42.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

RCRUY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Recruit Holdings Co Ltd ADR reported a net income of 103.87B and revenue of 978.22B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

ATLKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atlas Copco AB reported a net income of 6.49B and revenue of 42.02B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RCRUY and ATLKY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATLKY has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to RCRUY (9.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCRUY dropped -65.71% vs ATLKY's -69.14%.

RCRUY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCRUY and ATLKY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer