PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATLKY vs. MITSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlas Copco AB (ATLKY) and Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATLKY achieves a 16.47% return, which is significantly higher than MITSY's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ATLKY has underperformed MITSY with an annualized return of 15.80%, while MITSY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.06% annualized return.


ATLKY

1D
0.03%
1M
8.56%
YTD
16.47%
6M
17.06%
1Y
34.07%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
15.80%

MITSY

1D
-0.22%
1M
-16.29%
YTD
0.23%
6M
1.34%
1Y
46.31%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
21.65%
10Y*
18.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
16.47%20.68%-10.78%48.16%-29.36%37.53%30.53%71.31%-42.06%45.28%
MITSY
Mitsui & Company Ltd
0.23%43.31%13.10%28.00%23.12%28.70%4.06%14.13%-4.90%20.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ATLKY and MITSY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2011

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATLKY:

$100.23B

MITSY:

$83.68B

EPS

ATLKY:

SEK 5.38

MITSY:

¥5.90K

PE Ratio

ATLKY:

36.61

MITSY:

16.10

PEG Ratio

ATLKY:

3.79

MITSY:

4.65

PS Ratio

ATLKY:

6.09

MITSY:

0.96

PB Ratio

ATLKY:

7.93

MITSY:

1.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATLKY:

SEK 157.53B

MITSY:

¥14.19T

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATLKY:

SEK 67.13B

MITSY:

¥1.35T

EBITDA (TTM)

ATLKY:

SEK 41.05B

MITSY:

¥1.01T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATLKY vs. MITSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATLKY
ATLKY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ATLKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATLKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATLKY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ATLKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATLKY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MITSY
MITSY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MITSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITSY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
MITSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITSY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlas Copco AB (ATLKY) and Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATLKYMITSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.67

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

6.01

-2.01

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATLKY Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the MITSY Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATLKY and MITSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATLKY drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than MITSY's maximum drawdown of -44.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATLKY and MITSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATLKYMITSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.14%

-44.45%

-24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

-27.89%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.79%

-33.95%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.92%

-33.95%

-13.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.43%

-33.95%

-16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-27.89%

+23.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.74%

-16.09%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.52%

7.72%

+0.80%

Volatility

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Volatility Comparison

Atlas Copco AB (ATLKY) and Mitsui & Company Ltd (MITSY) have volatilities of 9.54% and 9.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATLKYMITSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.54%

9.35%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.98%

24.14%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.94%

30.80%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.37%

29.67%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.87%

26.76%

+7.11%

Dividends

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Dividend Comparison

ATLKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while MITSY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
2.14%1.76%1.72%1.26%3.21%1.25%2.21%1.69%7.41%2.65%4.72%2.87%
MITSY
Mitsui & Company Ltd
0.00%1.17%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.65%3.82%0.00%

Financials

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlas Copco AB and Mitsui & Company Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T20222023202420252026
42.02B
3.71T
(ATLKY) Total Revenue
(MITSY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATLKY values in SEK, MITSY values in JPY

ATLKY vs. MITSY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atlas Copco AB and Mitsui & Company Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
42.2%
9.9%
Portfolio components
ATLKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Copco AB reported a gross profit of 17.74B and revenue of 42.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

MITSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported a gross profit of 368.30B and revenue of 3.71T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.

ATLKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Copco AB reported an operating income of 8.33B and revenue of 42.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

MITSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported an operating income of 106.13B and revenue of 3.71T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.9%.

ATLKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Copco AB reported a net income of 6.49B and revenue of 42.02B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

MITSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsui & Company Ltd reported a net income of 226.10B and revenue of 3.71T, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATLKY and MITSY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATLKY has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to MITSY (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATLKY dropped -69.14% vs MITSY's -44.45%.

MITSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATLKY and MITSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer