RCMFX vs. QCGDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX).
RCMFX is managed by Schwartz. It was launched on Dec 30, 1983. QCGDX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Dec 26, 2019.
Performance
RCMFX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCMFX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCMFX Schwartz Value Focused Fund | 0.00% | 7.68% | 62.73% | 1.14% | 21.16% | 31.12% | 11.68% | -0.07% |
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 2.93% | 1.02% | 9.87% | 14.74% | -12.23% | 32.19% | 14.65% | 0.10% |
Returns By Period
RCMFX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCGDX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCMFX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCMFX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCMFX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank
RCMFX
QCGDX
RCMFX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCMFX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.57 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between RCMFX and QCGDX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RCMFX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison
RCMFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCMFX Schwartz Value Focused Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 30.02% | 4.29% | 0.87% | 6.72% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 2.81% | 7.64% |
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 0.67% | 0.69% | 4.42% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RCMFX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCMFX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.69% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.27% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
RCMFX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCMFX | QCGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.53% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.77% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.53% | — |