PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCMFX vs. GWSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RCMFX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GWSAX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.72%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.63%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RCMFX
Schwartz Value Focused Fund
0.00%7.68%62.73%1.14%21.16%31.12%11.68%18.67%-8.13%13.71%
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
8.60%2.11%13.19%11.90%-13.71%27.12%8.69%26.78%-25.30%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RCMFX and GWSAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

0.77

The correlation between RCMFX and GWSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCMFX vs. GWSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCMFX

GWSAX
GWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RCMFXGWSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Drawdowns

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCMFXGWSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

Volatility

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCMFXGWSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCMFX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than GWSAX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

RCMFX vs. GWSAX - Dividend Comparison

RCMFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
4.84%5.11%4.39%4.57%5.00%3.90%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.49%1.16%
RCMFX
Schwartz Value Focused Fund
0.00%0.00%30.02%4.29%0.87%6.72%2.45%0.00%2.81%7.64%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RCMFX and GWSAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCMFX and GWSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer