RCMFX vs. GABVX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX).

RCMFX is managed by Schwartz. It was launched on Dec 30, 1983. GABVX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Sep 29, 1989.

Performance

RCMFX vs. GABVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RCMFX vs. GABVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RCMFX Schwartz Value Focused Fund	0.00%	7.68%	62.73%	1.14%	21.16%	31.12%	11.68%	18.67%	-8.13%	13.71%
GABVX Gabelli Value 25 Fund	2.52%	28.77%	4.10%	8.75%	-15.87%	14.86%	5.86%	17.84%	-8.19%	12.77%

Returns By Period

RCMFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GABVX

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: -5.45%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 25.68%
• 3Y*: 12.13%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: 7.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCMFX vs. GABVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCMFX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than GABVX's 1.43% expense ratio.

GABVX

Gabelli Value 25 Fund

RCMFX

Schwartz Value Focused Fund

Return for Risk

RCMFX vs. GABVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABVX

GABVX Risk / Return Rank: 82
GABVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GABVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GABVX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GABVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GABVX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCMFX vs. GABVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwartz Value Focused Fund (RCMFX) and Gabelli Value 25 Fund (GABVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCMFX	GABVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.51	—

Correlation

The correlation between RCMFX and GABVX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RCMFX vs. GABVX - Dividend Comparison

RCMFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GABVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RCMFX Schwartz Value Focused Fund	0.00%	0.00%	30.02%	4.29%	0.87%	6.72%	2.45%	0.00%	2.81%	7.64%	0.00%	0.00%
GABVX Gabelli Value 25 Fund	10.74%	11.01%	0.00%	12.15%	17.78%	12.01%	9.32%	10.28%	9.54%	6.82%	7.49%	17.39%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RCMFX	GABVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-63.09%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.99%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.83%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.53%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCMFX	GABVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.12%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.24%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.54%	—