RCLR vs. DFUV

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

RCLR (Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF) and DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCLR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Reckoner, while DFUV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RCLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DFUV.

Performance

RCLR vs. DFUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF (RCLR) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RCLR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DFUV

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 13.57%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	$24.58M	$21.35M	$22.47M
RCLR Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF	$13.19K	$15.18K	$51.38K

RCLR vs. DFUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RCLR Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF	1.28%
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	9.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLR and DFUV is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.17

Return for Risk

RCLR vs. DFUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCLR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFUV

DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 93
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCLR vs. DFUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF (RCLR) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCLR	DFUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.14	—

Drawdowns

RCLR vs. DFUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLR drawdown since its inception was -3.77%, smaller than the maximum DFUV drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLR and DFUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLR	DFUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.77%	-17.60%	+13.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-1.40%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-3.54%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCLR	DFUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	12.04%	-8.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.66%	16.13%	-12.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.66%	16.13%	-12.47%

RCLR vs. DFUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUV's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLR vs. DFUV - Dividend Comparison

RCLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	1.31%	1.55%	1.64%	1.72%	1.34%
RCLR Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLR and DFUV in my portfolio?

RCLR and DFUV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCLR or DFUV?

On fees, DFUV is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCLR or DFUV?

DFUV is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RCLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCLR or DFUV?

DFUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for RCLR.

What is the main difference between RCLR and DFUV?

RCLR is categorized as Actively Managed, while DFUV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RCLR and 0.21% for DFUV.