RCGE vs. AVGV
RCGE (RockCreek Global Equality ETF) and AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RCGE returned 11.30% vs 33.28% for AVGV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RCGE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.
Performance
RCGE vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCGE achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 14.95% return.
RCGE
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGV
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 33.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCGE vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCGE RockCreek Global Equality ETF | 2.35% | 17.28% |
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 14.95% | 20.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCGE and AVGV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025 | 0.84 |
The correlation between RCGE and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCGE vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank
RCGE
AVGV
RCGE vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCGE | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.47 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 4.28 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 16.73 | -12.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCGE | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.64 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.40 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
RCGE vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCGE drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum AVGV drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCGE and AVGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCGE | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.38% | -17.03% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -8.12% | -1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -2.21% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -2.29% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.07% | +0.64% |
Volatility
RCGE vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison
RockCreek Global Equality ETF (RCGE) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) have volatilities of 4.15% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCGE | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.97% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 10.11% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 13.13% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 15.01% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 15.01% | +0.23% |
RCGE vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCGE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCGE vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison
RCGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than AVGV's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 1.14% |
RCGE RockCreek Global Equality ETF | 1.77% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCGE and AVGV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCGE has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to AVGV (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCGE dropped -12.38% vs AVGV's -17.03%.
On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 33.28% vs 11.30% for RCGE. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, AVGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 33.28% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RCGE.
AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.77% for RCGE.
They also come from different issuers: RockCreek and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RCGE and 0.26% for AVGV.
AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCGE and AVGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer