RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO
RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) and RUDH.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCDC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by RBC, while RUDH.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RCDC.TO returned 20.53%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for RUDH.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCDC.TO achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than RUDH.TO's 8.17% return.
RCDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- YTD
- 18.89%
- 1Y
- 33.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RUDH.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 14.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 18.89% | 19.29% | 17.27% | 1.66% |
RUDH.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF | 8.17% | 8.78% | 5.71% | 33.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCDC.TO and RUDH.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.26 |
The correlation between RCDC.TO and RUDH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RCDC.TO
RUDH.TO
RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCDC.TO | RUDH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.20 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.14 | 1.11 | +5.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.59 | 2.78 | +27.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum RUDH.TO drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and RUDH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCDC.TO | RUDH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -50.85% | +39.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -13.38% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.88% | -34.44% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.38% | +15.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -16.27% | +14.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 5.35% | -4.26% |
Volatility
RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) is 2.12%, while RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF (RUDH.TO) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that RCDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUDH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCDC.TO | RUDH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 2.86% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.71% | 8.74% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 17.95% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 92.45% | -82.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 88.21% | -78.13% |
Dividends
RCDC.TO vs. RUDH.TO - Dividend Comparison
RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than RUDH.TO's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.12% | 6.38% | 6.46% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RUDH.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders CAD Hedged ETF | 1.56% | 1.47% | 2.78% | 3.26% | 4.27% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 4.01% | 4.96% | 4.03% | 4.32% | 4.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCDC.TO and RUDH.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCDC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while RUDH.TO is Dividend.
Find the right allocation for RCDC.TO and RUDH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer