PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026
Documentation

RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) and PINC.TO (Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RCDC.TO returned 19.57%/yr vs 14.78%/yr for PINC.TO. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RCDC.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PINC.TO.

Performance

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RCDC.TO having a 18.15% return and PINC.TO slightly lower at 17.29%.

RCDC.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.69%
6M
18.27%
YTD
18.15%
1Y
33.08%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
15.89%

PINC.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.34%
6M
15.30%
YTD
17.29%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
6.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

PINC.TO

Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund
CA$17.08KCA$13.56KCA$13.69K

RCDC.TO

RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF
CA$53.65KCA$58.46KCA$76.00K

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
RCDC.TO
RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF		18.15%19.29%17.27%1.66%
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund		17.29%14.41%11.54%-3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RCDC.TO and PINC.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF

Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund

Often compared with RCDC.TO:
RCDC.TO vs. RPF.TORCDC.TO vs. RCD.TORCDC.TO vs. RBNK.TORCDC.TO vs. RIDH.TORCDC.TO vs. CNQE.TORCDC.TO vs. BKCL.TORCDC.TO vs. RUD.TO
Often compared with PINC.TO:
PINC.TO vs. MNY.TOPINC.TO vs. RATE.TOPINC.TO vs. CIF.TOPINC.TO vs. XUT.TOPINC.TO vs. HEQT.TOPINC.TO vs. FIE.TOPINC.TO vs. PDIV.TO

Return for Risk

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
RCDC.TO
RCDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
PINC.TO
PINC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RCDC.TOPINC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.77
3.78

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.31
5.37

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.78

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.98

6.71

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.64

26.05

+3.59

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCDC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is comparable to the PINC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCDC.TO and PINC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.88%, smaller than the maximum PINC.TO drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCDC.TO and PINC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RCDC.TOPINC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-43.84%

+32.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-3.59%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.88%

-8.55%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-21.04%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.94%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-5.79%

+3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.92%

+0.17%

Volatility

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) at 1.64%. This indicates that RCDC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RCDC.TOPINC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

1.64%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

5.04%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

6.37%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.07%

8.38%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.07%

14.69%

-4.62%

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCDC.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PINC.TO's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCDC.TO vs. PINC.TO - Dividend Comparison

RCDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than PINC.TO's 4.43% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PINC.TO
Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund		4.43%5.05%5.48%5.78%5.51%4.60%5.33%5.06%3.66%
RCDC.TO
RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF		6.27%6.38%6.46%6.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RCDC.TO and PINC.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RCDC.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RCDC.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PINC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: RBC and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for RCDC.TO and 1.04% for PINC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCDC.TO and PINC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer