RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO
RCD.TO (RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF) and VUDV.TO (Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCD.TO charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for VUDV.TO.
Performance
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RCD.TO
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
VUDV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 7.44% |
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 8.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCD.TO and VUDV.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RCD.TO
VUDV.TO
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCD.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCD.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 7.57 | -7.02 |
Drawdowns
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.07%, which is greater than VUDV.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCD.TO and VUDV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCD.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.07% | -0.68% | -37.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | 0.00% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -0.16% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCD.TO | VUDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 7.57% | +6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 7.57% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 7.57% | +6.91% |
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VUDV.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCD.TO vs. VUDV.TO - Dividend Comparison
RCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, while VUDV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 2.88% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 3.39% | 3.36% | 2.34% | 3.45% | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.01% | 3.08% | 3.62% |
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCD.TO and VUDV.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUDV.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for RCD.TO.
They also come from different issuers: RBC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for RCD.TO and 0.28% for VUDV.TO.
Find the right allocation for RCD.TO and VUDV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer