RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RCD.TO (RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF) and RCDB.NEO (RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCD.TO is a Dividend fund managed by RBC, while RCDB.NEO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by RBC. Over the past 5 years, RCD.TO returned 11.76%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for RCDB.NEO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCD.TO charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RCDB.NEO.

Performance

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCD.TO achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than RCDB.NEO's 1.15% return.

RCD.TO

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 6M: 5.22%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 11.76%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

RCDB.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 3.01%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF	12.09%	21.74%	10.79%	10.31%	-3.37%	27.62%	-1.89%	7.36%
RCDB.NEO RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF	1.15%	3.75%	5.58%	5.68%	-4.07%	-0.68%	5.61%	0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RCD.TO and RCDB.NEO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019	0.06

The correlation between RCD.TO and RCDB.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCD.TO

RCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 50
RCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
RCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

RCDB.NEO

RCDB.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 38
RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RCDB.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RCDB.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RCDB.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
RCDB.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCD.TO	RCDB.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.29	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.85	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.24	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	1.91	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	6.47	+1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCD.TO and RCDB.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCD.TO	RCDB.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.29	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.80	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.45	+0.10

Drawdowns

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.07%, which is greater than RCDB.NEO's maximum drawdown of -8.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCD.TO and RCDB.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCD.TO	RCDB.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.07%	-8.31%	-29.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-1.59%	-7.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.55%	-1.59%	-14.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.68%	-6.90%	-9.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-0.03%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.42%	-1.41%	-4.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	0.47%	+2.27%

Volatility

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) at 0.67%. This indicates that RCD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCDB.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCD.TO	RCDB.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	0.67%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.35%	1.84%	+10.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	2.35%	+11.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.26%	2.83%	+10.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	5.48%	+9.00%

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than RCDB.NEO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCD.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Dividend Comparison

RCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than RCDB.NEO's 2.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF	2.88%	3.07%	3.17%	3.39%	3.36%	2.34%	3.45%	3.12%	3.64%	3.01%	3.08%	3.62%
RCDB.NEO RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF	2.11%	1.96%	1.58%	1.22%	1.16%	1.33%	1.68%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCD.TO and RCDB.NEO in my portfolio?

RCD.TO and RCDB.NEO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCD.TO or RCDB.NEO?

On fees, RCDB.NEO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCD.TO or RCDB.NEO?

RCDB.NEO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for RCD.TO.

What is the main difference between RCD.TO and RCDB.NEO?

RCD.TO is categorized as Dividend, while RCDB.NEO is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for RCD.TO and 0.17% for RCDB.NEO.