RCD.TO vs. NDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV).
RCD.TO and NDIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RCD.TO is managed by RBC. NDIV is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2022.
Performance
RCD.TO vs. NDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCD.TO vs. NDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 5.56% | 21.74% | 10.79% | 10.31% | -2.64% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 37.72% | -1.87% | 15.30% | 12.98% | 6.35% |
Different Trading Currencies
RCD.TO is traded in CAD, while NDIV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NDIV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCD.TO achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than NDIV's 37.72% return.
RCD.TO
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
NDIV
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 13.61%
- YTD
- 37.72%
- 6M
- 29.88%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCD.TO vs. NDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than NDIV's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCD.TO vs. NDIV — Risk / Return Rank
RCD.TO
NDIV
RCD.TO vs. NDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCD.TO | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.15 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.58 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 1.55 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 4.40 | +3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCD.TO | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.15 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.02 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between RCD.TO and NDIV is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RCD.TO vs. NDIV - Dividend Comparison
RCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than NDIV's 5.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCD.TO RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF | 3.05% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 3.39% | 3.36% | 2.34% | 3.45% | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.01% | 3.08% | 3.62% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 5.08% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RCD.TO vs. NDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.07%, which is greater than NDIV's maximum drawdown of -20.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCD.TO and NDIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCD.TO | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.07% | -19.73% | -18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -17.75% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -1.27% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -4.27% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 5.77% | -2.77% |
Volatility
RCD.TO vs. NDIV - Volatility Comparison
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) at 4.25%. This indicates that RCD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCD.TO | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 4.25% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 13.78% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.88% | 23.91% | -9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 18.88% | -5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 18.88% | -4.41% |