PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RCAT vs. PRZO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RCAT vs. PRZO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares (PRZO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCAT achieves a 40.98% return, which is significantly higher than PRZO's -26.98% return.


RCAT

1D
-6.91%
1M
18.94%
YTD
40.98%
6M
39.05%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
131.59%
5Y*
26.88%
10Y*

PRZO

1D
-3.06%
1M
7.50%
YTD
-26.98%
6M
-52.77%
1Y
-49.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCAT vs. PRZO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RCAT
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
40.98%-38.29%1,360.23%-24.79%
PRZO
ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares
-26.98%-59.85%185.59%-82.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RCAT and PRZO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023

0.24

The correlation between RCAT and PRZO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RCAT:

$1.35B

PRZO:

$11.14M

EPS

RCAT:

-$0.78

PRZO:

-$0.33

PS Ratio

RCAT:

23.24

PRZO:

13.95

PB Ratio

RCAT:

5.66

PRZO:

11.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

RCAT:

$52.98M

PRZO:

$741.37K

Gross Profit (TTM)

RCAT:

$2.86M

PRZO:

-$40.47K

EBITDA (TTM)

RCAT:

-$79.24M

PRZO:

-$7.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RCAT vs. PRZO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCAT
RCAT Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RCAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCAT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RCAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCAT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PRZO
PRZO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PRZO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRZO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRZO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PRZO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRZO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCAT vs. PRZO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) and ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares (PRZO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RCATPRZODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.99

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

-0.64

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

-1.16

+2.08

RCAT vs. PRZO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the PRZO Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCAT and PRZO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RCAT vs. PRZO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCAT drawdown since its inception was -99.21%, which is greater than PRZO's maximum drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCAT and PRZO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RCATPRZODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.21%

-88.53%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.08%

-76.78%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.60%

-85.45%

+49.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-74.24%

+8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.17%

42.41%

-12.24%

Volatility

RCAT vs. PRZO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) is 40.71%, while ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares (PRZO) has a volatility of 50.24%. This indicates that RCAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRZO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RCATPRZODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.71%

50.24%

-9.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

85.22%

91.31%

-6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

120.36%

117.45%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.04%

174.37%

-59.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29,209.75%

174.37%

+29,035.38%

Dividends

RCAT vs. PRZO - Dividend Comparison

Neither RCAT nor PRZO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RCAT vs. PRZO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Cat Holdings, Inc. and ParaZero Technologies Ltd. Ordinary Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
15.47M
208.21K
(RCAT) Total Revenue
(PRZO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RCAT and PRZO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRZO has higher volatility (50.24%) compared to RCAT (40.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCAT dropped -99.21% vs PRZO's -88.53%.

RCAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RCAT and PRZO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer