PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

RBTZ.AX (BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF) and NDQ.AX (BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBTZ.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while NDQ.AX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBTZ.AX returned 2.80%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for NDQ.AX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBTZ.AX achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than NDQ.AX's 10.94% return.

RBTZ.AX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-4.15%
6M
-9.48%
YTD
-5.08%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
—

NDQ.AX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.46%
6M
9.73%
YTD
10.94%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
21.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RBTZ.AX
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF		-5.08%5.25%24.18%37.27%-38.23%14.53%38.97%32.73%-21.72%
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		10.94%11.35%38.19%53.22%-28.42%35.46%34.50%39.66%-14.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RBTZ.AX and NDQ.AX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018

0.72

The correlation between RBTZ.AX and NDQ.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF

Often compared with NDQ.AX:
NDQ.AX vs. IVVNDQ.AX vs. QQQNDQ.AX vs. IOONDQ.AX vs. BTC-USDNDQ.AX vs. SCHGNDQ.AX vs. TQQQNDQ.AX vs. JPM

Return for Risk

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBTZ.AX
RBTZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RBTZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX
NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RBTZ.AXNDQ.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.21
1.31

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.48
1.82

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.23

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

1.30

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

3.30

-2.65

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBTZ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBTZ.AX and NDQ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBTZ.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.86%, which is greater than NDQ.AX's maximum drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBTZ.AX and NDQ.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RBTZ.AXNDQ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.86%

-30.79%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.55%

-15.17%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-21.27%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-30.79%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.79%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.19%

-3.79%

-7.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-5.85%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.79%

6.08%

+1.71%

Volatility

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF (RBTZ.AX) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) at 5.30%. This indicates that RBTZ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDQ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RBTZ.AXNDQ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

5.30%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

11.69%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

15.12%

+8.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.69%

19.15%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

19.15%

+3.20%

Dividends

RBTZ.AX vs. NDQ.AX - Dividend Comparison

RBTZ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than NDQ.AX's 1.47% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		1.47%0.93%1.81%2.09%3.36%3.33%2.47%2.22%0.37%0.25%0.40%
RBTZ.AX
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF		0.05%1.87%4.61%0.05%0.87%3.02%3.79%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RBTZ.AX and NDQ.AX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBTZ.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while NDQ.AX is Nasdaq-100. RBTZ.AX tracks BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while NDQ.AX tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBTZ.AX and NDQ.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer