RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L
RBOT.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and HNSS.L (HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBOT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF, while HNSS.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RBOT.L returned 17.77%/yr vs 56.55%/yr for HNSS.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBOT.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HNSS.L.
Performance
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RBOT.L is traded in USD, while HNSS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HNSS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT.L achieves a 23.01% return, which is significantly lower than HNSS.L's 86.71% return.
RBOT.L
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- 6M
- 17.95%
- YTD
- 23.01%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
HNSS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.96%
- 6M
- 70.76%
- YTD
- 86.71%
- 1Y
- 145.99%
- 3Y*
- 56.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 23.01% | 17.58% | 5.55% | 39.74% | -21.97% |
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 86.71% | 56.48% | 17.97% | 39.90% | -33.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT.L and HNSS.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between RBOT.L and HNSS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT.L
HNSS.L
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.50 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.73 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 12.45 | -5.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT.L drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum HNSS.L drawdown of -51.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.L and HNSS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -51.82% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -30.87% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.12% | -37.48% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.42% | -12.47% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -18.91% | +8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 11.73% | -7.04% |
Volatility
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOT.L) is 10.24%, while HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a volatility of 18.25%. This indicates that RBOT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT.L | HNSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 18.25% | -8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.69% | 32.57% | -10.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.38% | 57.52% | -32.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 41.06% | -16.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 41.06% | -18.22% |
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOT.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HNSS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBOT.L vs. HNSS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RBOT.L nor HNSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT.L and HNSS.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HNSS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HNSS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RBOT.L.
RBOT.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while HNSS.L is Semiconductors. RBOT.L tracks iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF, while HNSS.L tracks Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOT.L and 0.35% for HNSS.L.
Find the right allocation for RBOT.L and HNSS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer