RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO
RBNK.TO (RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF) and PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index, while PDC.TO is a Dividend fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, RBNK.TO returned 17.57%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for PDC.TO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBNK.TO charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDC.TO.
Performance
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RBNK.TO having a 19.94% return and PDC.TO slightly lower at 19.02%.
RBNK.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 19.94%
- 6M
- 24.92%
- 1Y
- 60.94%
- 3Y*
- 32.53%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- —
PDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 19.02%
- 6M
- 17.30%
- 1Y
- 35.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBNK.TO RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF | 19.94% | 44.94% | 22.08% | 11.01% | -13.14% | 40.30% | 3.34% | 16.82% | -9.14% | 3.71% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 19.02% | 21.62% | 16.14% | 6.74% | -4.34% | 29.91% | -5.70% | 24.75% | -12.03% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBNK.TO and PDC.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RBNK.TO and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RBNK.TO
PDC.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
RBNK.TO
PDC.TO
Basic Materials
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Communication Services
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Consumer Defensive
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Energy
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Healthcare
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
-
Industrials
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Real Estate
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Technology
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Utilities
RBNK.TO
-
PDC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RBNK.TO
PDC.TO
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBNK.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.89 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.74 | 9.20 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.06 | 34.01 | -4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBNK.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59 | 4.30 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 1.22 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.75 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBNK.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.08%, smaller than the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBNK.TO and PDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBNK.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.08% | -41.94% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -3.86% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.87% | -10.91% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -18.24% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -0.26% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -4.56% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.04% | +1.06% |
Volatility
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) at 2.97%. This indicates that RBNK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBNK.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 2.97% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 7.24% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.33% | 8.27% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 10.84% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 15.29% | +2.92% |
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBNK.TO has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBNK.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
RBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than PDC.TO's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.26% | 3.84% | 4.29% | 4.56% | 4.05% | 3.49% | 4.85% | 4.14% | 4.90% | 4.05% | 3.61% | 4.20% |
RBNK.TO RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF | 2.97% | 3.39% | 4.50% | 4.77% | 4.49% | 3.07% | 4.18% | 3.86% | 4.06% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBNK.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
RBNK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: RBC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RBNK.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for RBNK.TO and PDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer