PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLU vs. BUXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLU vs. BUXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLU achieves a -79.38% return, which is significantly lower than BUXX's 1.61% return.


RBLU

1D
-1.39%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
-79.38%
6M
-85.52%
1Y
-87.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUXX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLU vs. BUXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBLU and BUXX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLU vs. BUXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLU
RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BUXX
BUXX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BUXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BUXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLU vs. BUXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBLUBUXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.85

-1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

14.67

-15.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

60.39

-61.80

RBLU vs. BUXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLU Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the BUXX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLU and BUXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBLUBUXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

3.55

-4.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

3.82

-4.40

Drawdowns

RBLU vs. BUXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLU drawdown since its inception was -94.59%, which is greater than BUXX's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLU and BUXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLUBUXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.59%

-0.60%

-93.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.59%

-0.29%

-94.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.24%

0.00%

-94.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.04%

-0.05%

-42.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.97%

0.07%

+61.90%

Volatility

RBLU vs. BUXX - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) has a higher volatility of 34.21% compared to Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF (BUXX) at 0.30%. This indicates that RBLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLUBUXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.21%

0.30%

+33.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.98%

0.78%

+98.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.35%

1.22%

+118.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.02%

1.46%

+115.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.02%

1.46%

+115.56%

RBLU vs. BUXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BUXX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLU vs. BUXX - Dividend Comparison

RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than BUXX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BUXX
Strive Enhanced Income Short Maturity ETF
4.73%4.95%5.55%1.92%
RBLU
T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF
6.28%1.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLU and BUXX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBLU has higher volatility (34.21%) compared to BUXX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLU dropped -94.59% vs BUXX's -0.60%.

On 1-year performance, BUXX leads with 4.30% vs -87.47% for RBLU. On fees, BUXX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, BUXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUXX has performed better with a 4.30% return vs -87.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUXX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 4.73% for BUXX.

RBLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BUXX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Strive. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for RBLU and 0.26% for BUXX.

BUXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLU and BUXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer