RBFFX vs. ANWPX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Bond Fund of America (RBFFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX).
RBFFX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Aug 4, 2008. ANWPX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Mar 13, 1973.
Performance
RBFFX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBFFX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBFFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America | -0.54% | 7.49% | 1.47% | 4.65% | -13.03% | -0.64% | 11.07% | 8.13% | 0.17% | 3.53% |
ANWPX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A | -5.30% | 21.33% | 16.76% | 24.63% | -25.92% | 17.64% | 33.42% | 30.10% | -5.99% | 28.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBFFX achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly higher than ANWPX's -5.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RBFFX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.
RBFFX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
ANWPX
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- -5.30%
- 6M
- -3.65%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBFFX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBFFX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBFFX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank
RBFFX
ANWPX
RBFFX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America (RBFFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBFFX | ANWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.55 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.42 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 5.78 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBFFX | ANWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.41 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.70 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.65 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBFFX and ANWPX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RBFFX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison
RBFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than ANWPX's 6.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBFFX American Funds The Bond Fund of America | 4.07% | 4.43% | 4.61% | 3.53% | 2.42% | 2.31% | 5.34% | 3.76% | 2.67% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.30% |
ANWPX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A | 6.94% | 6.57% | 5.13% | 5.36% | 4.16% | 7.01% | 4.13% | 3.67% | 7.59% | 5.50% | 3.86% | 6.14% |
Drawdowns
RBFFX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBFFX drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBFFX and ANWPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBFFX | ANWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -52.34% | +34.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -11.75% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -34.45% | +16.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.62% | -34.45% | +16.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -8.73% | +6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -8.13% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 2.89% | -1.86% |
Volatility
RBFFX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds The Bond Fund of America (RBFFX) is 1.49%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that RBFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBFFX | ANWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 6.24% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 10.32% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 17.02% | -12.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 17.15% | -11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 17.77% | -12.89% |