PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBB vs. PGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RBB vs. PGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBB Bancorp (RBB) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBB achieves a 30.43% return, which is significantly lower than PGC's 65.53% return.


RBB

1D
1.03%
1M
-2.21%
6M
28.79%
YTD
30.43%
1Y
51.33%
3Y*
26.53%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.10%

PGC

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.95%
6M
45.34%
YTD
65.53%
1Y
87.00%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
9.32%
ALL TIME*
5.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.27M$11.80M$8.18M
$5.00M$5.37M$4.74M

RBB vs. PGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBB
RBB Bancorp
30.43%4.38%11.03%-4.42%-18.49%74.37%-25.70%22.98%-34.99%17.75%
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
65.53%-12.47%8.27%-19.31%5.74%56.52%-25.58%23.59%-27.64%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between RBB and PGC is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.62

The correlation between RBB and PGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RBB:

$446.60M

PGC:

$814.69M

EPS

RBB:

$2.42

PGC:

$2.91

PE Ratio

RBB:

10.90

PGC:

15.83

PS Ratio

RBB:

1.91

PGC:

2.08

PB Ratio

RBB:

0.84

PGC:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

RBB:

$238.90M

PGC:

$395.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RBB:

$98.61M

PGC:

$135.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

RBB:

$48.28M

PGC:

$117.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RBB Bancorp

Often compared with PGC:
PGC vs. GS

Return for Risk

RBB vs. PGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBB
RBB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PGC
PGC Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBB vs. PGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBB Bancorp (RBB) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBBPGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

4.74

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

14.22

-4.64

RBB vs. PGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the PGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBB and PGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBB vs. PGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBB drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, roughly equal to the maximum PGC drawdown of -70.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBB and PGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBBPGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.22%

-70.43%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.18%

-17.30%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.17%

-34.23%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.85%

-50.02%

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-4.86%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.87%

-26.70%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

5.77%

-0.55%

Volatility

RBB vs. PGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBB Bancorp (RBB) is 6.68%, while Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that RBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBBPGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

8.15%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

20.59%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.07%

31.29%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.00%

33.99%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.63%

37.13%

-1.50%

Dividends

RBB vs. PGC - Dividend Comparison

RBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than PGC's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
0.43%0.72%0.62%0.67%0.54%0.56%0.88%0.65%0.79%0.57%0.65%0.97%
RBB
RBB Bancorp
2.43%3.10%3.12%3.36%2.69%1.95%2.15%1.89%1.99%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RBB vs. PGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RBB Bancorp and Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RBB and PGC have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGC has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to RBB (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBB dropped -69.22% vs PGC's -70.43%.

PGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBB and PGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer