PGC vs. GS
Compare and contrast key facts about Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PGC or GS.
Correlation
The correlation between PGC and GS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PGC vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PGC:
0.82
GS:
2.80
PGC:
1.41
GS:
3.86
PGC:
1.17
GS:
1.52
PGC:
0.67
GS:
7.58
PGC:
3.85
GS:
25.09
PGC:
8.72%
GS:
2.97%
PGC:
40.66%
GS:
26.68%
PGC:
-70.43%
GS:
-78.84%
PGC:
-16.57%
GS:
-0.35%
Fundamentals
PGC:
$599.00M
GS:
$204.34B
PGC:
$1.84
GS:
$40.40
PGC:
18.51
GS:
16.24
PGC:
0.68
GS:
3.94
PGC:
$316.27M
GS:
$53.16B
PGC:
$158.64M
GS:
$53.16B
PGC:
$17.28M
GS:
$21.77B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGC achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 14.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PGC has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 6.82%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.83% annualized return.
PGC
6.43%
11.26%
33.22%
45.26%
3.00%
6.82%
GS
14.54%
13.08%
35.24%
74.47%
25.58%
15.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PGC vs. GS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PGC
GS
PGC vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PGC vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
PGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than GS's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGC Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation | 0.59% | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.88% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.57% | 0.65% | 0.97% | 1.08% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
PGC vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGC drawdown since its inception was -70.43%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGC and GS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PGC vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 8.12%. This indicates that PGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PGC vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities