PGC vs. GS
PGC (Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — PGC in Banks - Regional, GS in Capital Markets. Over the past 10 years, PGC returned 9.32%/yr vs 23.14%/yr for GS. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PGC vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGC achieves a 65.53% return, which is significantly higher than GS's 16.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PGC has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 9.32%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.14% annualized return.
PGC
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- 6M
- 45.34%
- YTD
- 65.53%
- 1Y
- 87.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.04%
GS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 45.09%
- 5Y*
- 25.12%
- 10Y*
- 23.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.08B | $2.11B | $2.25B | |
| $11.27M | $11.80M | $8.18M |
PGC vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGC Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation | 65.53% | -12.47% | 8.27% | -19.31% | 5.74% | 56.52% | -25.58% | 23.59% | -27.64% | 14.12% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 16.98% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGC and GS is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1999 | 0.35 |
The correlation between PGC and GS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PGC:
$814.69M
GS:
$300.43B
PGC:
$2.91
GS:
$67.36
PGC:
15.83
GS:
15.12
PGC:
2.08
GS:
2.69
PGC:
1.17
GS:
1.86
PGC:
$395.74M
GS:
$117.94B
PGC:
$135.32M
GS:
$67.57B
PGC:
$117.39M
GS:
$31.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGC vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
PGC
GS
PGC vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGC | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.25 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 2.25 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | 6.94 | +7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGC vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGC drawdown since its inception was -70.43%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGC and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGC | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.43% | -78.84% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.30% | -19.42% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.23% | -30.90% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.02% | -32.84% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.20% | -48.75% | -16.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -11.60% | +6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.70% | -22.57% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 6.30% | -0.53% |
Volatility
PGC vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) is 8.15%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 14.38%. This indicates that PGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGC | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 14.38% | -6.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.59% | 26.02% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.29% | 31.51% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.99% | 28.60% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.13% | 30.06% | +7.07% |
Dividends
PGC vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
PGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than GS's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.67% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
PGC Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation | 0.43% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.56% | 0.88% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.57% | 0.65% | 0.97% |
Financials
PGC vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PGC and GS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (14.38%) compared to PGC (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGC dropped -70.43% vs GS's -78.84%.
PGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGC and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer