PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBAIX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class (RBAIX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBAIX achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's -0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, RBAIX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 9.92%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.48% annualized return.


RBAIX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.33%
YTD
6.25%
6M
5.80%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
9.92%

TRLGX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
18.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBAIX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class
6.25%16.23%11.87%18.12%-17.14%13.45%14.64%22.71%-4.82%17.68%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
-0.26%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RBAIX and TRLGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.87

The correlation between RBAIX and TRLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBAIX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBAIX
RBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class (RBAIX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBAIXTRLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

0.83

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

2.57

+8.35

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBAIX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBAIX drawdown since its inception was -25.49%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBAIX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBAIXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.49%

-55.56%

+30.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-18.18%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.40%

-21.17%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-40.44%

+17.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.49%

-40.44%

+14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-5.97%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-8.67%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

5.85%

-4.24%

Volatility

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class (RBAIX) is 3.25%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that RBAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBAIXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

6.43%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

13.44%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

16.52%

-7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

22.48%

-11.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.58%

21.83%

-10.25%

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBAIX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBAIX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

RBAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than TRLGX's 13.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBAIX
T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund I Class
7.10%7.44%7.43%3.92%5.27%9.43%4.70%4.97%8.56%6.16%3.55%0.00%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.73%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBAIX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to RBAIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBAIX dropped -25.49% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

RBAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBAIX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer