RB vs. SCDV

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and SCDV (Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000, while SCDV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bahl & Gaynor. RB is passively managed, while SCDV is actively managed. Over the past year, RB returned 17.71% vs 16.60% for SCDV. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SCDV.

Performance

RB vs. SCDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than SCDV's 18.35% return.

RB

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 6.10%
• YTD: 8.38%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.99%

SCDV

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: 9.11%
• YTD: 18.35%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	$4.11K	$8.30K	$83.87K
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	$321.96K	$246.99K	$235.24K

RB vs. SCDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	8.38%	10.85%
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	18.35%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RB and SCDV is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.67

The correlation between RB and SCDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RB vs. SCDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RB

RB Risk / Return Rank: 96
RB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RB Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SCDV

SCDV Risk / Return Rank: 37
SCDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SCDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SCDV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
SCDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SCDV Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RB vs. SCDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RB	SCDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	1.05	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.62	1.62	+2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.19	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.51	1.46	+7.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.07	4.39	+22.69

RB vs. SCDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RB Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the SCDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RB and SCDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RB vs. SCDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -2.09%, smaller than the maximum SCDV drawdown of -23.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and SCDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RB	SCDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-23.14%	+21.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.09%	-11.38%	+9.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.70%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-5.27%	+4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	3.79%	-3.13%

Volatility

RB vs. SCDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) is 1.34%, while Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that RB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RB	SCDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	4.64%	-3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.71%	12.12%	-7.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.50%	15.91%	-9.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.38%	18.81%	-12.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.38%	18.81%	-12.43%

RB vs. SCDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDV's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

RB vs. SCDV - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than SCDV's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	2.26%	1.78%	0.00%
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF	0.41%	0.61%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RB and SCDV in my portfolio?

RB and SCDV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RB or SCDV?

SCDV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to RB (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RB dropped -2.09% vs SCDV's -23.14%.

Which ETF is better, RB or SCDV?

On 1-year performance, RB leads with 17.71% vs 16.60% for SCDV. On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, RB has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RB or SCDV?

Over the 1-year period, RB has performed better with a 17.71% return vs 16.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RB or SCDV?

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SCDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RB or SCDV?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.41% for SCDV.

What is the main difference between RB and SCDV?

RB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCDV is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.70% for SCDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.