RB vs. CPSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and CPSP (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000, while CPSP is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Calamos. RB is passively managed, while CPSP is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSP.

Performance

RB vs. CPSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than CPSP's 3.18% return.

RB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. CPSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	6.76%	10.58%
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	3.18%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RB and CPSP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

RB vs. CPSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSP

CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 98
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RB vs. CPSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RB	CPSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.15	3.17	-0.02

Drawdowns

RB vs. CPSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, roughly equal to the maximum CPSP drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and CPSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RB	CPSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-1.73%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	0.00%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-0.08%	-0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RB	CPSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.21%	1.42%	+4.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.21%	2.37%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.21%	2.37%	+3.84%

RB vs. CPSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSP's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

RB vs. CPSP - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while CPSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	2.00%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RB and CPSP in my portfolio?

RB and CPSP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RB or CPSP?

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RB or CPSP?

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RB or CPSP?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for CPSP.

What is the main difference between RB and CPSP?

RB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CPSP is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.69% for CPSP.