PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAYS vs. FRNW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAYS vs. FRNW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RAYS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FRNW

1D
-1.91%
1M
7.89%
YTD
34.11%
6M
34.18%
1Y
86.03%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAYS vs. FRNW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
19.15%

RAYS vs. FRNW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RAYS
FRNW

Technology

66.9%
5.5%

Industrials

21.4%
30.1%

Utilities

6.8%
43.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

21.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

RAYS
66.9%
FRNW
5.5%

Industrials

RAYS
21.4%
FRNW
30.1%

Utilities

RAYS
6.8%
FRNW
43.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RAYS
4.0%
FRNW

-

Basic Materials

RAYS
0.9%
FRNW

-

Communication Services

RAYS

-

FRNW

-

Consumer Defensive

RAYS

-

FRNW

-

Energy

RAYS

-

FRNW
21.0%

Financial Services

RAYS

-

FRNW

-

Healthcare

RAYS

-

FRNW

-

Real Estate

RAYS

-

FRNW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAYS vs. FRNW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAYS

FRNW
FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAYS vs. FRNW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAYS vs. FRNW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAYSFRNWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

Drawdowns

RAYS vs. FRNW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYS drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FRNW drawdown of -59.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS and FRNW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAYSFRNWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-59.37%

+59.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.15%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-33.33%

+33.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

Volatility

RAYS vs. FRNW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAYSFRNWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

25.61%

-25.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

28.35%

-28.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

28.35%

-28.35%

RAYS vs. FRNW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FRNW's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAYS vs. FRNW - Dividend Comparison

RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
0.94%1.25%1.43%1.30%0.69%0.04%
RAYS
Global X Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FRNW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRNW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.

FRNW has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RAYS and 0.39% for FRNW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAYS and FRNW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer