RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L
RAYS.L (Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAYS.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RAYS.L returned -3.85%/yr vs 19.21%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAYS.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAYS.L achieves a 39.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPXP.L's 10.55% return.
RAYS.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 15.83%
- YTD
- 39.17%
- 6M
- 42.81%
- 1Y
- 107.94%
- 3Y*
- -3.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAYS.L Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 39.17% | 36.36% | -36.34% | -29.61% | 5.10% | -6.84% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAYS.L and SPXP.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2021 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
RAYS.L
SPXP.L
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAYS.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.52 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.02 | 4.11 | +4.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.84 | 15.13 | +6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAYS.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27 | 2.78 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 1.15 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAYS.L drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAYS.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.42% | -25.46% | -47.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -7.09% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.74% | -20.77% | -43.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.84% | -0.21% | -32.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.69% | -3.50% | -38.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 1.93% | +3.00% |
Volatility
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) has a higher volatility of 12.48% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that RAYS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAYS.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.48% | 2.65% | +9.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.95% | 7.24% | +14.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.89% | 10.49% | +22.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 14.23% | +22.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 16.22% | +20.65% |
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAYS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAYS.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RAYS.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RAYS.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for RAYS.L.
RAYS.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. RAYS.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for RAYS.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for RAYS.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer