RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L
RAYS.L (Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc) and NCLP.L (WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Energy Equities funds - RAYS.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD while NCLP.L tracks the WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RAYS.L returned 107.94% vs 78.50% for NCLP.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAYS.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for NCLP.L.
Performance
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAYS.L achieves a 39.17% return, which is significantly higher than NCLP.L's 17.09% return.
RAYS.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 15.83%
- YTD
- 39.17%
- 6M
- 42.81%
- 1Y
- 107.94%
- 3Y*
- -3.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCLP.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -8.79%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 78.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RAYS.L Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 39.17% | 47.90% |
NCLP.L WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 17.09% | 94.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAYS.L and NCLP.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
RAYS.L
NCLP.L
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAYS.L | NCLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.02 | 2.90 | +6.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.84 | 7.54 | +14.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAYS.L | NCLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27 | 1.73 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 2.11 | -2.22 |
Drawdowns
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAYS.L drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, which is greater than NCLP.L's maximum drawdown of -26.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS.L and NCLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAYS.L | NCLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.42% | -26.96% | -46.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -26.96% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.84% | -15.07% | -17.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.69% | -7.53% | -34.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 10.38% | -5.45% |
Volatility
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (RAYS.L) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) have volatilities of 12.48% and 12.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAYS.L | NCLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.48% | 12.79% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.95% | 31.79% | -9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.89% | 45.11% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 45.42% | -8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 45.42% | -8.55% |
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAYS.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NCLP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAYS.L vs. NCLP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RAYS.L nor NCLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RAYS.L and NCLP.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NCLP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NCLP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for RAYS.L.
RAYS.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD, while NCLP.L tracks WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for RAYS.L and 0.45% for NCLP.L.
Find the right allocation for RAYS.L and NCLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer