PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAYJ vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAYJ vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF (RAYJ) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAYJ achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 33.95% return.


RAYJ

1D
-2.54%
1M
-7.30%
6M
10.11%
YTD
17.58%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-0.93%
1M
4.15%
6M
29.74%
YTD
33.95%
1Y
37.41%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAYJ vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RAYJ
Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF
17.58%20.16%10.53%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
33.95%5.93%-3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RAYJ and GSG is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2024

0.01

The correlation between RAYJ and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAYJ vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAYJ
RAYJ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RAYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RAYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAYJ vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF (RAYJ) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAYJGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.00

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

6.66

-0.95

RAYJ vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAYJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAYJ and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAYJ vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYJ drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYJ and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAYJGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-89.62%

+73.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.00%

-18.81%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.11%

-59.56%

+48.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-63.68%

+60.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

5.63%

-0.92%

Volatility

RAYJ vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF (RAYJ) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 7.17%. This indicates that RAYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAYJGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

7.17%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.82%

21.54%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

23.48%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.36%

22.80%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

22.00%

+1.36%

RAYJ vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAYJ has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAYJ vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

RAYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%
RAYJ
Rayliant SMDAM Japan Equity ETF
4.80%1.72%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAYJ and GSG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RAYJ has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to GSG (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAYJ dropped -15.96% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 37.41% vs 26.83% for RAYJ. On fees, RAYJ is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 37.41% return vs 26.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RAYJ is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

RAYJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

RAYJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for RAYJ and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAYJ and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer