RAUS vs. SCHD
RAUS (RACWI US ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the RACWI US Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RAUS charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
RAUS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAUS achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.
RAUS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RAUS RACWI US ETF | $111.38K | $210.03K | $249.99K |
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M |
RAUS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RAUS RACWI US ETF | 11.19% | 4.77% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.03% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAUS and SCHD is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAUS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
RAUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD
RAUS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RACWI US ETF (RAUS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAUS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAUS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAUS drawdown since its inception was -8.63%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAUS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAUS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -33.37% | +24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -1.24% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -3.30% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
RAUS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAUS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 11.13% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 14.39% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 16.72% | -3.79% |
RAUS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAUS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RAUS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
RAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAUS RACWI US ETF | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAUS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RAUS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAUS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.22% for RAUS.
RAUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. RAUS tracks RACWI US Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for RAUS and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for RAUS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer