PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAPZX vs. LFMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAPZX achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than LFMIX's 10.28% return. Over the past 10 years, RAPZX has outperformed LFMIX with an annualized return of 6.77%, while LFMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.18% annualized return.


RAPZX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
13.17%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
6.77%

LFMIX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.12%
YTD
10.28%
6M
11.33%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
13.17%11.96%4.35%3.88%-2.05%23.51%-0.84%17.77%-8.44%6.51%
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
10.28%2.89%6.77%-6.55%15.43%0.07%4.55%12.71%-5.11%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RAPZX and LFMIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.14

Over the past year, RAPZX and LFMIX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAPZX vs. LFMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAPZX
RAPZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RAPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RAPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

LFMIX
LFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAPZXLFMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

2.83

-1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

4.19

-1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.54

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

5.93

-2.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.25

19.05

-7.79

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the LFMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAPZX and LFMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAPZXLFMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.83

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.60

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.55

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.37

-0.01

Drawdowns

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAPZX drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, which is greater than LFMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAPZX and LFMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAPZXLFMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-22.68%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-2.60%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.84%

-8.88%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-12.26%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.69%

-12.26%

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-0.46%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-6.77%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.81%

+0.78%

Volatility

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I (LFMIX) at 1.33%. This indicates that RAPZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAPZXLFMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

1.33%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

4.29%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

5.59%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

7.20%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.78%

7.61%

+5.17%

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAPZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than LFMIX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAPZX vs. LFMIX - Dividend Comparison

RAPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than LFMIX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFMIX
LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I
2.85%3.14%3.21%3.17%14.35%4.95%4.73%4.66%3.12%5.89%1.95%3.08%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
1.28%1.44%3.20%2.71%3.08%9.61%1.71%2.85%2.06%1.76%2.83%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAPZX and LFMIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RAPZX has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to LFMIX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAPZX dropped -30.69% vs LFMIX's -22.68%.

LFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAPZX and LFMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer