PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAPZX vs. CBFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAPZX achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than CBFAX's 5.57% return. Over the past 10 years, RAPZX has underperformed CBFAX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while CBFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.11% annualized return.


RAPZX

1D
0.16%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
10.45%
6M
9.85%
1Y
12.49%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
6.62%

CBFAX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
5.57%
6M
5.44%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
10.45%11.96%4.35%3.88%-2.05%23.51%-0.84%17.77%-8.44%6.51%
CBFAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund
5.57%17.10%6.50%13.69%-14.29%9.14%10.45%17.22%-6.18%13.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RAPZX and CBFAX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between RAPZX and CBFAX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAPZX vs. CBFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAPZX
RAPZX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
RAPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RAPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CBFAX
CBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAPZXCBFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.35

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

10.00

-3.05

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the CBFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAPZX and CBFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAPZX drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, which is greater than CBFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAPZX and CBFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAPZXCBFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-23.35%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-6.73%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.84%

-8.90%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-22.56%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.69%

-23.35%

-7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-1.29%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-3.69%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.58%

+0.22%

Volatility

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) is 2.22%, while American Funds Global Balanced Fund (CBFAX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that RAPZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAPZXCBFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

3.12%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

7.25%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

8.63%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

9.97%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.77%

10.47%

+2.30%

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAPZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than CBFAX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAPZX vs. CBFAX - Dividend Comparison

RAPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than CBFAX's 5.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund
5.85%6.32%5.50%1.58%1.49%6.01%1.21%1.83%2.25%3.11%1.93%3.20%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
1.31%1.44%3.20%2.71%3.08%9.61%1.71%2.85%2.06%1.76%2.83%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAPZX and CBFAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBFAX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to RAPZX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAPZX dropped -30.69% vs CBFAX's -23.35%.

CBFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAPZX and CBFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer