PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAMP vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RAMP vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAMP achieves a 28.98% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 243.32% return.


RAMP

1D
0.26%
1M
0.69%
6M
35.77%
YTD
28.98%
1Y
17.79%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*

MU

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.65%
6M
183.94%
YTD
243.32%
1Y
687.66%
3Y*
149.71%
5Y*
66.39%
10Y*
54.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAMP vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
28.98%-3.29%-19.83%61.60%-51.12%-34.49%52.26%24.44%-4.69%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
243.32%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-39.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RAMP and MU is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018

0.35

The correlation between RAMP and MU shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RAMP:

$2.30B

MU:

$1.11T

EPS

RAMP:

$1.46

MU:

$44.42

PE Ratio

RAMP:

25.90

MU:

22.05

PEG Ratio

RAMP:

0.02

MU:

0.08

PS Ratio

RAMP:

3.00

MU:

12.33

PB Ratio

RAMP:

2.47

MU:

11.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

RAMP:

$812.94M

MU:

$90.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RAMP:

$574.82M

MU:

$65.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

RAMP:

$97.51M

MU:

$44.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAMP vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAMP
RAMP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RAMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RAMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAMP vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAMPMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.69

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

23.23

-22.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

83.25

-82.44

RAMP vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAMP and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAMP vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAMP drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAMP and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAMPMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.83%

-98.25%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.13%

-30.28%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.19%

-57.63%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.71%

-57.63%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.93%

-19.29%

-36.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.38%

-58.07%

+9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.24%

8.43%

+7.81%

Volatility

RAMP vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) is 1.60%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.63%. This indicates that RAMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAMPMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

33.63%

-32.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.91%

62.19%

-28.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.68%

75.68%

-31.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.53%

54.75%

-8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.04%

50.65%

-2.61%

Dividends

RAMP vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

RAMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RAMP vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
206.09M
41.46B
(RAMP) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RAMP vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
70.6%
84.6%
Portfolio components
RAMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 145.54M and revenue of 206.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.6%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

RAMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.29M and revenue of 206.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

RAMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 19.26M and revenue of 206.09M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RAMP and MU have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to RAMP (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAMP dropped -81.83% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAMP and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer