PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RALVX vs. RTDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RALVX achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than RTDYX's 13.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RALVX has underperformed RTDYX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while RTDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.


RALVX

1D
0.92%
1M
1.44%
6M
7.34%
YTD
10.39%
1Y
18.94%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
8.18%
ALL TIME*
3.69%

RTDYX

1D
1.44%
1M
2.49%
6M
11.67%
YTD
13.03%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
14.06%
ALL TIME*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RALVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund
10.39%17.44%11.36%17.18%-16.76%17.82%6.13%15.33%-7.92%13.55%
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
13.03%16.05%22.01%24.92%-16.48%27.22%13.88%30.27%-7.16%21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RALVX and RTDYX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.93

The correlation between RALVX and RTDYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RALVX vs. RTDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RALVX
RALVX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RTDYX
RTDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RTDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RTDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) and Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RALVXRTDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.89

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

12.45

-1.53

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RALVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the RTDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RALVX and RTDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RALVX drawdown since its inception was -59.59%, which is greater than RTDYX's maximum drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RALVX and RTDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RALVXRTDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.59%

-37.43%

-22.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.33%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.71%

-37.43%

+23.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-37.43%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.08%

-37.43%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.73%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.18%

-6.27%

-6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.93%

-0.05%

Volatility

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) is 3.11%, while Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that RALVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RALVXRTDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.52%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

9.67%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

12.32%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

24.48%

-11.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.65%

22.10%

-8.45%

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RALVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RTDYX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RALVX vs. RTDYX - Dividend Comparison

RALVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, less than RTDYX's 30.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RALVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund
10.53%11.68%2.31%1.21%4.20%17.98%0.54%6.24%7.01%5.99%4.79%1.23%
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
30.89%35.18%31.60%4.66%6.03%6.51%3.44%6.62%11.47%7.65%1.79%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RALVX and RTDYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RTDYX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to RALVX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RALVX dropped -59.59% vs RTDYX's -37.43%.

RTDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RALVX and RTDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer